Custom written essays, Online course handling, Dissertation projects, Exams and Quizzes

PRAC_6552 Comprehensive Well-Woman Paper “Nursing”

INSTRUCTIONS PRAC_6552 Comprehensive Well-Woman Paper “Nursing”

Write an 2-3-page Comprehensive Well-Woman Paper that addresses the following:

Physical exam

Labs, tests, and other diagnostics

Differential diagnoses

Management plan, including diagnosis, treatment, patient education, and follow-up care

Provide evidence-based guidelines to support treatment plan. Note: Use your Learning Resources and evidence from scholarly sources from your personal search to support your treatment plan of care.

Reflection

Reflect on some additional factors for your patient:

What are implications if you have observed or know of some domestic violence? Would this change your plan of care? If so, how?

Use your Learning Resources and evidence from scholarly sources from your personal search to support your reflection.

The primary diagnoses

1. annual well woman exam with abnormal findings—Z01.411: 

Differential Diagnoses:

1.HX OF TOBACCO USE– Z87.891

2.SEVERE OBESITY (BMI >= 40) E66.01   

3. SCREENING FOR STI- Z11.3    

Encounter for gynecological examination (general) (routine) with abnormal findings. Then list what you find supporting abnormal findings example- leukorrhea, obesity, tobacco use, HNT, depression.

ReminderLinks to an external site.: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements

Note: Your Comprehensive Well-Woman Paper must be signed by Day 7 of Week 10.

PRAC_6552_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite an 8- to 10-page Comprehensive Well-Woman Exam that addresses the following: • Age, race and ethnicity, and partner status of the patient• Current health status, including chief concern or complaint of the patient• Contraception method (if any) • Patient history, including medical history, family medical history, gynecologic history, obstetric history, and personal social history (as appropriate to current problem) • Social Determinants of Health assessment• Review of systems• Physical exam• Labs, tests, and other diagnostics• Differential diagnoses• Management plan, including diagnosis, treatment, patient education, and follow-up care• Provide evidence-based guidelines to support treatment plan.

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

All required points are addressed, with results that are presented fully and clearly … Provides 5 current and credible scholarly sources to support the treatment plan of care.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

At least 8 points are addressed with results that are presented clearly. … Provides at least 4 current and credible scholarly sources to support the treatment plan of care.

35 to >34.0 pts

Fair

No fewer than 7 points are addressed. One or more results presented in a manner that is vague or incomplete. … Provides at least 3 current and credible scholarly sources to support the treatment plan of care.

34 to >0 pts

Poor

Fewer than 7 points are addressed. One or more results are presented in a manner that is vague, incomplete, or inacurrate. … Provides at least 2 current and credible scholarly sources to support the treatment plan of care.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on the following: Reflect on some additional factors for your patient: • What are the implications if your patient was pregnant or just delivered? • What are implications if you have observed or know of some domestic violence? Would this change your plan of care? If so, how?

40 to >39.0 pts

Excellent

Reflection is clearly presented, with implications that are well-formed, clear, and fully expressed. … Provides at least 3 current and credible scholarly sources to support reflection.

39 to >31.0 pts

Good

Reflection is clearly presented, with implications that are clearly expressed. … Provides at least 3 current and credible scholarly sources to support reflection.

31 to >30.0 pts

Fair

Reflection is presented in manner that is vague or unclear. Implications are not fully or clearly expressed. … Provides at least 2 current and credible scholarly source to support reflection.

30 to >0 pts

Poor

Reflection is presented in manner that is vague or unclear. Implications are unclear, or one or both implications not expressed. … Provides at least 1 current and credible scholarly source to support reflection.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

All notes must be written in APA format and submitted with Turnitin by the due date to meet grading requirements.

 some key points to follow:

Get Answer