Ambiguous figure illusions: Can we get a glimpse into the mind?

Ambiguous figure illusions: Can we get a glimpse into the mind?

Question

Author’s view on ambiguous numbers

Nathalia Gjersoe is an author who expressed her opinion on images with multiple meanings and ambiguous article titles. Figure Illusion: Can you glimpse inside your mind?

Ambiguous images, also known as reversible shapes, represent a single image in different modes, making it very difficult to modify the image. However, precisely explaining how similar images are constructed in different ways involves multiple sensory and cognitive processes, so images can be interpreted in multiple ways. These processes always operate both top-down and bottom-up and influence what a person sees. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to analyze the first perspective after seeing an “ambiguous figure”. This can help researchers predict psychology by considering several papers dealing with the illusion of ambiguous numbers (Meeter & Olivers, 2016). for example;

(Source: – Natalia Gelsau, 2016)

Figure 1 Illusions of ambiguous shapes: Do they provide insight into the mind?
According to the author, this painting above is also known as “Wife and Mother-in-Law”, indicating that this painting depicts her in two different ways. One side of the figure depicts a novice woman looking over her shoulder, and the other side depicts the profile of an older woman looking down (Meng & Tong, 2014).

Therefore, covering a wide range of aspects of human psychology through individual images, using suitable examples and authors, will make the entire study very interesting. It’s not easy to understand what the letters actually mean, but changing your perspective can help you see one thing in a different way. On the other hand, Jürgen Kornmayer and Michael Bach, in their paper “Ambiguous Diagrams,” say that when opinions fluctuate, something happens in the brain, not in the stimulus. In his view, when viewing ambiguous shapes, an individual’s perspective spontaneously flips while the visual data remains unchanged or constant (Rock, Hall, & Davis, 2014). He feels that the visual world is always stable and clear and appears exactly as one sees it. This study shows that neuroscience is looking at this problem from a different perspective, considering variations in brain systems as the reason for psychological changes in response to ambiguous numbers. You may also be shown two images and asked questions based on them. Example: The first photo you see.

As; Which photo did you see first?

According to the illustration above, people may see the duck first, and the rabbit is so cute and distinct that some people may see it as a rabbit, so it was thought that there were two types of humans. . Furthermore, there are many situations that may be perceived as positive by one person, but may be perceived as negative by another (Michael E. R. Nichols, 2018).

An alternative, one-sided hypothesis is that the mean score for the main condition will be significantly higher than the mean score for the control condition. The null hypothesis states that the main condition is not significantly higher than the control condition. However, this assumption is made based on the independent variables. H. “Score” and the dependent variable “Conditional vision. Preparing for the test.”

Therefore, it is very interesting for both researchers and readers to get more information about the main attitudes of different people towards ambiguous images through appropriate and appropriate examples. It was believed that different perspectives allowed him to observe one thing in different ways in order to determine the actual meaning of the letters. It can be concluded that the main purpose of this study is to analyze the first point of view of a person after seeing an “ambiguous figure”.

References

Jürgen Kornmeyer and Michael Bach, 2012. Ambiguous numbers – What happens in the brain when the perception, rather than the stimulus, changes. [Available online]. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00051/full >.

Nathalia Gjersoe, 2016. Illusions of ambiguous shapes: Do they provide insight into the mind? [Online]. Available from .

michael . R. Nicholls, 2018. The perception of ambiguous personality is influenced by the social bias of one’s own age. |Available online].

Meeter, M. & Olivers, C. N. (2016). Between-trial priming by ambiguity: A new explanation of priming in visual search. Visual Perception, 13(2), 202-222.

Meng, M. & Tong, F. (2014). Can attention selectively influence bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4(7), 2-2.

Locke, I., Hall, S., Davis, J. (2014) Why do ambiguous numbers reverse? Acta Psychologicala, 87(1), 33-59.