Identifying relevant literature and effectively analyzing its content are important for evidence-based arguments (Hansen & Machinen, 2018). Critically evaluating research helps us understand its strengths and limitations and helps us conduct effective analyses. This document describes the article “News Selection Dynamics in Online Political Discussion Forums: Self-Isolation or Multiple Exposure?” by Song et al. (2020). This review also highlights the authors’ research approaches, highlights their strengths and weaknesses, and suggests further improvements through evidence-based approaches. The research hypothesis and research question are clearly stated in the paper. Ideology plays an important role in the process of communication and the formation of social circles. The purpose of this study was to determine individual motivations to help understand news selection in online discussions about political issues. A clear and concise purpose is very important for research because it helps the reader to identify the most important elements of the research. The researchers argue that the dynamics of news selection are highly precise and will be discussed in detail, given growing concerns that the Internet’s algorithms could lead to the development of self-amplifying consumer echo chambers. argue that it is necessary. A study by Song et al. We focused on two main principles. (2020), including coherence and understanding of key motivating factors.
The research question of this paper was to assess how motivational consistency and accuracy are affected by message selection patterns in an online discussion forum. Additionally, this study is based on several hypotheses that help infer the behavioral characteristics of participants in online discussions. Systematic hypotheses are important and are included in research because they help connect the underlying theory to a specific research question. This helps assess the reliability and validity of studies and improve research quality (Berger, 2018).
Research data were collected retrospectively on online discussion forums from his November 23, 2012 to his December 19, 2012, 2012 South Korean presidential election. Data were collected from his 371 participants who participated in an online discussion forum. A non-probabilistic sampling approach was used in the study to ensure reproducibility of the Korean population in the study sample. This approach was suitable as it allowed greater diversity to be included in the study sample (Boyle & Schmierbach, 2019). Data collection was also conducted through surveys and data were systematically recorded for analysis. Data were evaluated using TERGM (Time Exponential Random Graph Model) analysis. Analytical tools such as TERGM allow systematic evaluation of collected data, minimizing research bias towards systematic findings.
The results of this study are highly relevant and important. In this study, although the literature focuses on the development of an online his echo his chamber in discussion forums via his algorithm, it is unusual for individuals to participate in discussions about their personal preferences. I point out that it is not. Therefore, this study provides new insights and helps identify motivations for online engagement and specific responses in political debates.
This study confirmed the activity-sharing and popularity-sharing effects. This result suggests that the homosexuality factor is a major determinant of news selection. This study is very important due to several factors. First, it helps us understand the motivations of individuals who choose the political implications of their conversations and discussions. Furthermore, this study breaks down the view that echo chambers are being imposed by the internet and online forums. There is evidence that participants can self-impose behavior. Consistency and understanding therefore emerge as key issues structuring individuals’ decisions to participate in online discussion forums.
A major strength of this study is a powerful analytical approach that helps decipher systematic results through data evaluation. This increases the reliability of research results and promotes the robustness of conclusive evidence. In addition, using a representative sample with representatives of different populations gives a comprehensive view of the population. The small sample size of this study, with only 371 participants, may be considered a weakness. Therefore, using a primary study sample with a larger sample size could have improved our study results.
It can therefore be concluded that this study provides an insightful understanding of the motivations behind online political debates and helps identify the behavioral and structural factors involved.
Berger, A. A (2018). Media and Communication Research Methods: An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publishing. https://books.google.com/books?hl=ja&lr=&id=6CFoDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=communication+research+methods+book&ots=A0fHDFWHWb&sig=76ZcqlRS2MYV611kr8xrTzt3fns
Boyle, M. P. & Schmierbach, M. (2019). Methods of Applied Communication Research: Getting Started as a Researcher. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780429296444/applied-communication-research-methods-michael-boyle-mike-Schmierbach
Hansen, A. & Macchin, D. (2018). Research methods in media and communication. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://books.google.com/books?hl=ja&lr=&id=XRxHEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=communication+research+methods+book&ots=jZf4GMJr6n&sig=LTk3zfo9Wug_J40n4eyqBXfI1hQ
Song, H., Cho, J., Benefield, GA (2020). News Selection Dynamics in Online Political Discussion Forums: Self-Isolation or Multiple Exposure? Communication Research, 47(1), 125-152. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0093650218790144
Select your paper details and see how much our professional writing services will cost.
Our custom human-written papers from top essay writers are always free from plagiarism.
Your data and payment info stay secured every time you get our help from an essay writer.
Your money is safe with us. If your plans change, you can get it sent back to your card.
We offer more than just hand-crafted papers customized for you. Here are more of our greatest perks.
Get instant answers to the questions that students ask most often.
See full FAQ